Donny's Dystopia - The Mad King
Day: 294 / 1461

1167 days 0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds remaining

Day 291: A Symphony of Indifference and Power Grabs: Donny's Latest Outrageous Acts

Thursday, 6 November 2025

Dopy Donny
Image Credit: AI

Useless Sack of Shit Stands Motionless as Guest Collapsing at White House Obesity Event

In a scene straight out of political satire, a guest collapsed in the Oval Office during an event on obesity drugs — and whilst everyone rushed to his aid, Donny just stood there like the useless piece of shit that he is.

(Image Credit: Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Donny remained motionless, watching blankly as staffers rushed to assist the fallen attendee. He's been described as looking “confused, maybe not even aware of what was happening,” as though the concept of reacting to another human’s distress was an unscripted moment he hadn’t rehearsed for.

While aides scrambled to clear the room and provide medical attention, Donny reportedly continued the event, pivoting back to his talking points about “America’s new era of health and wellness” — irony so thick it could clog an artery.

This latest Oval Office moment perfectly encapsulates the Trump administration’s approach to compassion: frozen, performative, and entirely out of touch. Insiders suggest The Don may have been too fixated on his own supposed weight-loss regimen — one he’s bragged about in recent weeks — to even notice what was unfolding a few feet away. Others think he simply didn’t care. After all, unless a crisis involves applause or flattery, it rarely registers.

White House staff later described the guest’s condition as stable, though officials were quick to redirect attention back to Trump’s “leadership on public health” — an assertion that landed about as well as the event itself.

The optics were disastrous: an event meant to promote health awareness derailed by an actual medical emergency — and a president too detached to respond. But perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised. This is the same man who once mused about injecting bleach, who dismissed a pandemic as a hoax, and who treats every tragedy like a PR inconvenience.

In any other administration, a guest collapsing at a health event would prompt reflection or at least a semblance of empathy. In The Don’s White House, it’s just another awkward tableau of narcissism and negligence.

So yes, the guest is recovering — but America is still stuck watching a leader who freezes at the sight of human need and mistakes callous indifference for strength. The Mad King didn’t miss a beat — because, frankly, he never had one.


70 Dead and Counting: The Don’s ‘Narco-Terror’ War Turns the Caribbean Into a Killing Field

Under the watch of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the Trump administration’s controversial campaign of airstrikes in the Caribbean has now claimed at least 70 lives, following yet another deadly assault on an alleged drug trafficking vessel this week.

The Pentagon released footage of the latest attack, which obliterated a small boat in international waters and killed three people. Hegseth proudly announced that the target was “operated by a Designated Terrorist Organization” — a phrase the administration has leaned on heavily, despite offering no public evidence linking any of the victims to actual terrorism or narcotics operations.

“To all narco-terrorists who threaten our homeland,” Hegseth declared, “if you want to stay alive, stop trafficking drugs. If you keep trafficking deadly drugs – we will kill you.”

It was a chilling statement — one that sounds more like a cartel threat than official U.S. policy. Since the so-called “narco-terror” campaign began in early September, 18 vessels — including 17 boats and a semi-submersible — have been destroyed by U.S. airstrikes. The administration calls them “lethal kinetic operations.” Legal scholars, however, are calling them something else: extrajudicial killings.

No U.S. troops have been harmed in the operations, largely because there has been no combat — only bombs dropped on poorly defined targets in international waters. Critics say the campaign is not only illegal under international law, but also dangerously destabilizing for the region. With U.S. warships and F-35s deployed off the coast of Venezuela and Colombia, Latin American leaders warn of an escalating military presence reminiscent of Cold War–era interventions.

Yet for The Don and his loyalists, the strikes serve a different purpose — not strategy, but spectacle. Each detonation is framed as another “victory” in a made-for-TV war, feeding the narrative of a strongman president who “kills the bad guys” while sidestepping Congress, oversight, and international norms.

But behind the bravado lies a grim tally — 70 dead, none named, none charged, none tried.

The administration’s refusal to provide evidence of drug activity, or even basic details about the victims, has drawn condemnation from human rights groups. “These are not drug interdictions,” said one Latin American security expert. “They are executions.”

The Don’s defenders call it decisive action. His critics call it state-sanctioned murder.

Either way, one thing is certain: America’s longest-running war on drugs has a new front — and a new body count.


Senate Bows to The Mad King: Republicans Hand Donny a Blank Check for War

In a dark day for American democracy, the Senate voted 49–51 to block a Democratic resolution that would have required President Donald Trump to seek congressional approval before launching strikes in Venezuela.

The vote — almost entirely along party lines — effectively gives Donny unfettered power to wage war in Latin America, bypassing Congress and the Constitution alike. Only two Republicans, Rand Paul and Lisa Murkowski, broke ranks to support the resolution. The rest of the GOP stood lockstep behind their leader, waving through his latest power grab like courtiers applauding a monarch.

The move ensures that The Mad King’s shadow war in the Caribbean and beyond can continue unchecked. The Trump administration has already deployed an advanced U.S. aircraft carrier to the region, expanding its military footprint and preparing for possible land-based strikes in Venezuela under the guise of combating “narco-terrorists.”

Critics call it what it is: a dangerous slide into authoritarian rule.

“This is not about drugs — it’s about power,” said one Democratic senator following the vote. “And today, the Senate surrendered it.”

The Don has repeatedly made his intentions clear. “We’re going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country,” he boasted earlier this month — an admission that the administration has abandoned any pretense of diplomacy, legality, or proportionality.

Human rights groups and constitutional scholars warn that the Senate’s failure to impose limits on Trump’s war powers effectively greenlights extrajudicial killings and unilateral military action — all without congressional debate or international authorization.

In the words of one foreign policy expert, “This is not oversight. It’s abdication.”

The Senate’s submission to the executive branch underscores how deeply Trump’s cult of personality has infected the Republican Party. Once the party of limited government, the GOP now eagerly hands its leader the tools of dictatorship — a man who sees global conflict as little more than a stage for his ego and re-election narrative.

Meanwhile, the death toll from Trump’s Caribbean strikes continues to climb, now exceeding 70, with no evidence that the victims were drug traffickers or terrorists.

The Constitution vests Congress with the power to declare war — but tonight’s vote makes clear that power has been quietly, almost casually, surrendered.

With this latest failure of courage, the Senate has effectively crowned Donald Trump commander, judge, and executioner — not just of foreign enemies, but of America’s own democratic traditions.


Supreme Court Backs Donny Yet Again: Ban on Gender-Accurate Passports

In a ruling that cements the Trump administration’s assault on LGBTQ+ rights, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has allowed The Don’s policy to stand — blocking transgender and non-binary individuals from selecting passport sex markers that reflect their gender identity.

The decision effectively forces millions of Americans to carry travel documents that deny who they are, a bureaucratic erasure that carries very real consequences for safety, dignity, and recognition.

Attorney General Pam Bondi, practically gleeful in victory, declared the ruling a win for what she called “the simple truth that there are only two sexes.” As if the infinite complexity of human identity could be reduced to a checkbox on a form.

Meanwhile, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent cut through the cruelty with devastating precision. Calling the ruling a “pointless but painful perversion,” she condemned the majority for prioritizing ideology over humanity.

“The Court’s decision imposes humiliation where compassion was required,” she wrote. “It turns a document meant for freedom of movement into a tool of state-sanctioned denial.”

This marks yet another chapter in The Don’s relentless campaign to legislate identity out of existence, all while dressing up bigotry as “biological realism.”

The passport policy — one of dozens of anti-trans measures advanced under Donny's second term — has been widely condemned by civil rights advocates and international human rights organizations. The UN Human Rights Office called it “a flagrant violation of dignity and equality principles under international law.”

But for The Don, this isn’t about policy or law. It’s about power — the power to dictate who belongs and who doesn’t.

By weaponizing the courts to impose his worldview, The Mad King has turned personal identity into a political battlefield, and in doing so, reminded the nation that his cruelty is not the byproduct of governance — it is the governance.

The Don’s America continues to shrink — a nation defined not by liberty or equality, but by the narrow confines of one man’s prejudice. And for millions of trans and non-binary Americans, that smallness now follows them across every border, stamped in ink by their own government.

For the record, here's all the "judgements" the Supreme Court have sided with Donny on:

SCOTUS Rulings

Watchdog Agency Head Firing Delayed - 21 February 2025
Details: The Court postponed action on removing the head of the Office of Special Counsel, delaying Trump's attempt to fire the watchdog agency head.
Policy Area Significance
Whistleblower Protection / Agency Independence Supports stability in independent oversight amid executive pressure.
Foreign Aid Payments Upheld - 5 March 2025
Details: The Court declined to allow Trump’s administration to withhold payments to aid organizations for work already performed.
Policy Area Significance
Foreign Policy Funding Affirms obligation to honor contracts and grants despite budgetary policy shifts.
Teacher Training Grant Cuts Allowed - 4 April 2025
Details: The Court lifted an injunction requiring reinstatement of teacher training grants promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Policy Area Significance
Education Funding / DEI Undercuts DEI-focused teacher support programs at state level.
Reinstatement of Fired Federal Employees Blocked - 8 April 2025
Details: The Court blocked an order requiring the reinstatement of thousands of probationary federal employees.
Policy Area Significance
Employment Law / Federal Workforce Strengthens executive discretion over staffing decisions.
Reentry Ordered for Wrongfully Deported Salvadoran - 10 April 2025
Details: The Court directed the government to facilitate return of a Salvadoran man who had been mistakenly deported to El Salvador.
Policy Area Significance
Immigration / Errors & Due Process Emphasizes accountability and correction of government errors in deportation.
Transgender Military Ban Allowed - 6 May 2025
Details: The Court permitted enforcement of Trump’s ban on transgender individuals serving in the military by lifting a nationwide injunction blocking discharges.
Policy Area Significance
Civil Rights / Military Policy Expands executive authority over military personnel policies, raises equal protection concerns.
Limits on Alien Enemies Act Deportations Maintained - 16 May 2025
Details: The Court upheld a block on deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, requiring due process and halting immediate removals.
Policy Area Significance
Immigration / Constitutional Law Reaffirms judicial oversight even in cases invoking wartime statutes.
Termination of Venezuelan TPS Allowed - 19 May 2025
Details: The Court allowed the administration to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelan migrants, by lifting a lower court’s order blocking the termination.
Policy Area Significance
Immigration / Humanitarian Status Undermines protections for migrants from crisis-affected countries.
Labor Board Officials Removal Allowed - 22 May 2025
Details: The Court allowed the dismissal of two Democratic members of federal labor boards by staying lower court orders preserving their posts.
Policy Area Significance
Administrative Law / Labor Further erodes independence of labor-related entities.
End of Immigration 'Parole' Upheld - 30 May 2025
Details: The Court put on hold a lower court’s order blocking revocation of temporary parole status for hundreds of thousands of migrants, allowing the administration to proceed with ending the program.
Policy Area Significance
Immigration / Status Protections Potentially exposes many to expedited removal, reducing avenues for relief.
Access to SSA Data Permitted - 6 June 2025
Details: The Court allowed Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency to access sensitive personal data from the Social Security Administration.
Policy Area Significance
Privacy / Government Access Raises privacy concerns regarding government surveillance power.
DOGE FOIA Record Disclosure Block Extended - 6 June 2025
Details: The Court paused lower court orders requiring disclosure of DOGE’s records under FOIA by staying production.
Policy Area Significance
Transparency / Advisory Bodies Reinforces executive control over advisory entity transparency.
Third-Country Deportations Allowed to Resume - 23 June 2025
Details: The Court lifted a lower court’s injunction, enabling Trump’s administration to deport migrants to countries other than their origin without offering them a chance to claim potential harm in those destinations.
Policy Area Significance
Immigration / Due Process Limits procedural safeguards for migrants; emphasizes executive authority in deportation decisions.
Birthright Citizenship Injunction Scope Narrowed - 27 June 2025
Details: The Court narrowed the scope of nationwide injunctions blocking Trump’s executive order restricting automatic birthright citizenship, without ruling on its legality.
Policy Area Significance
Immigration / Citizenship Clarifies limits on judicial power to issue nationwide halts on executive actions and underscores tension between executive authority and judicial oversight.
Limits on South Sudan Deportations Lifted - 3 July 2025
Details: The Court clarified that its June 23 decision also applied to lifting injunctions protecting eight individuals from being sent to South Sudan.
Policy Area Significance
Immigration / Human Rights Extends resumption of controversial deportations to politically unstable regions.
Mass Federal Layoffs Cleared - 8 July 2025
Details: The Court allowed nationwide government job cuts by staying a lower court’s injunction against sweeping reductions across federal agencies.
Policy Area Significance
Labor / Administrative Action Gives the administration broad leeway to reduce federal workforce despite legal challenges.
Education Department Dismantling Permitted - 14 July 2025
Details: The Court allowed Trump’s administration to proceed with dismantling the Department of Education by lifting a lower court’s block on layoffs and transfers.
Policy Area Significance
Education / Administrative Reform Signals support for sweeping structural changes to major agencies.
Removal of Consumer Product Safety Commissioners Allowed - 23 July 2025
Details: The Court upheld the administration’s ability to remove three CPSC members by lifting a lower court’s order blocking their dismissal.
Policy Area Significance
Administrative Law / Independent Agencies Signals weakening of tenure protections for regulatory agency officials.
NIH Grant Cuts Allowed - 21 August 2025
Details: The Court lifted a block on cuts to NIH grants for research focused on racial minorities or LGBT individuals.
Policy Area Significance
Research Funding / Diversity Initiatives Challenges DEI-related funding and scientific autonomy.
Immigration Raids Proceed in Southern California - 8 September 2025
Details: The Court allowed federal agents to carry out immigration raids in Southern California, putting on hold a lower court’s order that barred stops based on race, language, or accent.
Policy Area Significance
Immigration Enforcement Reaffirms executive discretion in immigration enforcement; raises Fourth Amendment concerns regarding profiling.
FTC Commissioner Removal Stayed - 8 September 2025
Details: The Court issued an administrative stay preventing the firing of FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter while considering the legality of the removal.
Policy Area Significance
Administrative Law / Agency Independence Raises questions about limits on executive power to remove independent agency officials.
Foreign Aid Withholding Pause Granted - 8 September 2025
Details: The Court temporarily paused a lower court order mandating spending of about $4 billion in foreign aid, allowing the administration to withhold the funds pending further review.
Policy Area Significance
Foreign Policy Funding / Congressional Appropriation Heightens separation-of-powers dispute over control of spending.
Supreme Court allows Trump officials to freeze billions in foreign aid - 26 September 2025
Details: The Court lifted a lower-court injunction and allowed the Trump administration to freeze over $4 billion in foreign aid that had been appropriated by Congress, siding with the executive branch’s request to withhold funds pending further review. The majority did not rule on the ultimate merits but emphasized that the harms to U.S. foreign policy weighed more heavily in their view than potential harm to aid recipients. A dissent by Justice Kagan (joined by the other liberal justices) criticized the use of the emergency docket for such high-stakes cases and warned of separation-of-powers consequences.
Policy Area Significance
Foreign Policy / Appropriations / Separation of Powers This decision strengthens executive control over congressional appropriations in the foreign aid domain, at least as an interim remedy, and highlights how the Court is increasingly willing to engage in high-stakes emergency rulings affecting core powers between branches.
Supreme Court upholds Trump administration rule limiting gender identity on passports - 6 November 2025
Details: The Supreme Court’s conservative majority sided with the Trump administration in a case challenging the State Department’s policy requiring passport applicants to list their sex based on biological markers rather than gender identity. The ruling overturns lower-court decisions that had allowed transgender and non-binary individuals to select gender markers aligned with their identities. Writing for the majority, the Court emphasized the government’s interest in maintaining 'biological accuracy' in identity documents, while critics argue the decision effectively erases the legal recognition of transgender Americans. In a sharp dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson denounced the ruling as a 'pointless but painful perversion' that serves no legitimate administrative purpose and inflicts real harm on vulnerable communities.
Policy Area Significance
Civil Rights / LGBTQ+ Rights / Administrative Law This decision curtails federal recognition of gender identity in official documents and reinforces executive authority over identification policy. It marks a significant rollback of transgender rights, underscoring the Court’s willingness to defer to executive interpretations even when they restrict individual identity and equal protection.