Donny's Dystopia - The Mad King
Day: 248 / 1461

1213 days 0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds remaining

Militarization and Use of Violence

Militarization and Use of Violence
Image Credit: Apu Gomes / AFP - Getty Images

Using violence against citizens and normalizing paramilitary support threatens domestic peace.

Status

Warning
Deployment of military or federal forces against domestic protesters
Encouraging or tolerating violence from political supporters
Rise of paramilitary groups aligned with ruling interests
Lack of accountability for state violence
See 33 days that have been marked as days that Militarize Governance

Analysis

Overview

The increasing use of force—whether through formal state institutions or encouraged paramilitary groups—is a classic hallmark of democratic backsliding.

Under Donald Trump’s second term, militarization of domestic governance and normalization of political violence have deepened.


1. Use of Federal Forces Against Protesters

In cities with significant anti-Trump demonstrations, federal agents and DHS personnel have been deployed with expanded authority:

  • Protesters have reported detentions without identification or probable cause. (New York Post, May 2025)
  • Governors and mayors in blue states have protested the incursions as violations of state sovereignty. (WSWS, May 2025)
  • Military-grade equipment made available for use in urban crowd control. (BBC 2017)

These deployments are framed as efforts to “restore law and order” but functionally operate to suppress dissent.


2. Encouragement of Paramilitary Groups

Trump has continued to signal support for far-right groups:

This rhetoric blurs the line between state power and unofficial armed enforcement.


Recent executive actions and DOJ guidance either lays groundwork for or grants expanded legal immunity to:

These protections will increase incidents of brutality while reducing accountability.


4. Erosion of Civil-Military Norms

Military and law enforcement institutions have been politicized:

The military’s traditional separation from domestic politics is being systematically undermined.


5. Symbolic Militarism and Authoritarian Aesthetics

Trump's administration has embraced militaristic imagery and spectacle:

These displays are used to project dominance, discourage dissent, and reinforce a “strongman” image.


Conclusion

The normalization of political violence and the expanded use of state force against civilians represent a dangerous escalation in democratic erosion. Trump’s second term has moved beyond rhetoric into systemic militarization—weakening civil protections, emboldening extremism, and reframing dissent as insurrection. The cost is not only human safety, but the democratic principle of civilian governance itself.

See 33 days that have been marked as days that Militarize Governance